genesis: the primeval history

documentary hypothesis | genesis: the primeval history | 2 creation accounts | cain & abel


The Documentary Hypothesis
 

  • For centuries, Jews and Christians have considered Moses to be the author of the Torah.

  • But scholars have noticed problems with this when reading the text critically:

    • Duplicate stories.

      • Ex: 3 different stories about a patriarch passing off his wife as his sister.

    • Inconsistency/contradiction:

      • In Gen 6, Noah is told to take 1 pair of each animal onto the ark.

      • In Gen. 7, he is told to take 7 pairs of clean animals, 1 pair of unclean.

    • Anachronism ("out of time" or in the wrong time)

      • Gen 36:31: "The following are the kings who reigned in the land of Edom before any king reigned over the Israelites."

      • How does the author know about an Israelite monarchy?

    • Name of God

      • Gen 4:26 claims that "Yahweh" was used as name for God since the time of Enosh, grandson of Adam.

      • But Ex 6:2-3 claims Moses was first to hear this name, centuries later.

         

  • Scholars initially explained this problems by holding to the belief that Moses was the author, but suggesting that some material may have been inserted (such as the account of Moses' death).
     

  • But further study revealed that the changes/insertions were consistent and could be broken down into different styles,

    • so, while Moses was still assumed to be the author, later editors (redactors) were believed to have reshaped the material.
       

  • In the 17th Century, Richard Simon, a Catholic priest, theorized that while Moses may have been the source of the traditions in the Torah, as we have it today it is a compilation of material from several different sources.

    • Simon's work was condemned by Catholics and Protestants.

    • Of 1300 printed copies of his book, all but 6 were burned.

    • Today, Simon's conclusion is accepted by the majority of Christians and Jews.
       

  • 18th and 19th centuries, The Documentary Hypothesis.

    • Developed by German scholars influenced by:

      • The critical assumptions of post-Enlightenment scientific reasoning

      • Darwin's theory of evolution published in On the Origin of Species

      • The work of G.W.F. Hegel, which applied Darwin to the "evolution" of religious belief.

    • Also known as the Graf-Wellhausen hypothesis, after the two scholars who are considered most significant to its development.
       

  • The theory proposes at least four sources behind the Torah:
     

  • J or Yahwist

    • oldest layer (9th-10th centuries BC)

    • uses "Yahweh" for God

    • portrays God with anthropomorphic features

      • walks in the garden of Eden

      • closes the door of the ark

      • smells Noah's sacrifice

      • walks with Abraham (disguised as a man)

    • Begins with Genesis 2 creation story

    • Uses Mt. Sinai for the place where the Mosaic covenant was established.

    • lived in Judah (southern kingdom)- text is clearly loyal to David and Davidic dynasty.

      • Abraham dwells in Hebron when he settles in Canaan- a key city in the south.
         

  • E or Elohist

    • second oldest

    • author uses elohim for God

    • written in northern part of Israel in 8th century BC

    • begins with Abraham story and offers alternative versions of many of the patriarchal stories and Moses' reception of the law.

    • After the fall of Israel to Assyria in 722 BC, the E traditions were carried to Judah and combined with J.
       

  • D or Deuteronomist

    • one century later, during the reign of king Josiah, a version of Deuteronomy was produced as part of a religious reform stressing a renewed loyalty to Yahwism.

    • The book of Deuteronomy, or at least part of it was “discovered” in the temple during this reform, around 621 BC.

    • Acc. to Deut 12:4-6, there is only one appropriate place to worship Yahweh- so Josiah went throughout his kingdom destroying rival sanctuaries.

    • has a distinct, cyclical view of history
       

  • P or Priestly

    • composed right around the time of the Babylonian Exile (6th century BC).

    • concerned with priestly regulations such as those found in Leviticus.

    • responsible for much of the legal material in the Torah as well as the genealogies.

    • written at a time when Israel’s national identity was threatened by outside forces, explaining its preoccupation with genealogies and rituals and customs.

    • This source is responsible for or was the final editor of most of the Torah’s legal material, from Exodus 35 through Leviticus to Numbers 10.

    • P is responsible for:

      • Elohim’s observance of the first sabbath in Genesis 1.

      • Detailed Tabernacle descriptions in Exodus 25-31, 35-40.

      • Aaron’s role as Moses’ spokesman and Israel’s first high priest.

      • The account of Moses’ death.

Genesis: The Primeval History

  • The name comes from the Gk for the first words of the text, "In beginning..."
     

  • Divided into two main parts:

    • Gen. 1-11: The Primeval History

    • Gen 12-50: The Patriarchal Narratives
       

  • Three of the sources in the Documentary Hypothesis are represented in Genesis: J, E, and P.
     

  • The Primeval History:

    • Noticeably different from the rest of the book in terms of style and content.

    • Contains material comparable to the mythology of cultures contemporary with ancient Israel.
       

    • What is myth?

      • Today, myth= lie, or at least untruth.
        ("That's just a myth.")
         

    • Why?

      • Since the Enlightenment (18th century), the human understanding of truth has changed,

      • because the assumptions upon which that understanding is based have changed.

      • Ancients assumed that the physical world was not the only world there was (The ancient worldview),

        • they believed in a world existing beyond the senses:

          • eternal

          • spiritual

          • perfect

      • The physical world was a flawed, temporary reflection of the eternal.

      • The purpose of myth was to reveal through story the truth of the eternal, spiritual world, which was considered timeless

        • always true to all people at all times (i.e. objectively true)

      • Myth is not concerned with historical detail or accuracy, it is concerned with what the ancients considered to be the truth about human nature.

      • Nearly every religious tradition contains myth of one form or another.
         

    • During the Enlightenment, philosophers rediscovered the writings of ancient authors like Aristotle, and there was a renewed interest in the pursuit of classical logic.
       

    • The claims of traditional religion were questioned to determine their "reasonableness."

      • The religious understanding of reality and the premises upon which it was based were challenged.
         

    • With the Scientific Revolution of the 19th century, the religious worldview was also challenged by the fundamental assumption of science:

      • That which is true was that which was scientifically provable by repeated experimentation with reliable results.
         

    • The Biblical stories of the miraculous or the extraordinary were examined and criticized in light of modern assumptions,

      • and the stories were found to be unverifiable, and therefore scientifically untrue.
         

    • "Myth" as a literary genre, took on this meaning- that which is "improvable," and therefore untrue.
       

    • Another twist: In the early 20 century, the "Postmodern" worldview began to dominate.

      • Suspicious of the claims of science to solve the world's problems and answer all questions,

      • Postmodernism sees science as just another story or narrative used by people to try and understand the world.

      • So science is no more true or false than any other narrative, religious or otherwise.

      • This is the philosophy behind the current trends of multiculturalism and tolerance (all cultures are equal- all are just narratives for understanding the world).

      • But this has led to relativism- truth is relative to the culture that defines it, and no one is better than any other, therefore all truth is relative...
         

    • In order to understand Genesis 1-11 (as well as other parts of the Bible), the literary genre must be considered,

      • because it influences the way the author intended for the story to be interpreted.

      • We must set aside modern notions of "myth" aside and understand the stories from the ancient perspective-

        • as revealing timeless truth for all people at all times in the form of narrative, or story.

The 2 Creation Accounts

  • Genesis 1:1-2:4 is the first account (the Priestly account),

    • although it was probably actually written after the J creation story.

  • Genesis 2:4b-25 is the second account (the Yahwist account)

    • the earlier of the two.
       

  • The Priestly Creation:
     

    • the order of creation does not appear to make sense in light of science/natural history:

      • Day 1:
        Light, called "day" and darkness, called "night."

      • Day 2:
        A dome to separate the waters above and below, called "the sky"

      • Day 3:
        Water under the sky gathered into a basin, revealing dry land. The water is called "the sea" the land is called "the earth."

      • Day 4:
        The two great lights (both unnamed), one governs the day and the other governs the night.

      • Day 5:
        sea creatures to fill the waters and birds to fill the sky under the dome.

      • Day 6:
        Land animals, including "man," to whom all plants and animals are given.

      • Day 7:
        Institution of Sabbath, or day of rest.
         

  • By this account, plants are created before the sun, which is needed to grow them. "Light" is also created before the sun, but its source is not described.

    • Is there logic behind the sequence? See for yourself. Do you see the relationship between the six days?

      The story is symmetrical:

      • Day 1, day and night are created, day 4, sources of light are created (they "occupy" the light).

      • Day 2, sky and water are separated (no earth yet), day 5 animals that occupy the sky and the water are created.

      • Day 3, the earth is created, day 6 animals that occupy the earth and mankind are created.
         

    • This story also has parallels to the creation myths of other Ancient Near eastern cultures, esp. the Babylonian myth "enuma elish" :
       

      • The Babylonian god Marduk is the focus of the story.

      • Recounts his defeat of an older generation of ANE gods.

      • Acc. to this story, the god Apsu and the goddess Tiamat were the parents of all the other gods.

      • When Apsu is killed by Ea, Tiamat seeks revenge for the death of her lover.

      • Ea turns to his father Anshar for advice, and Anshar decides to send Marduk to kill Tiamat.

      • Marduk agrees to do so only if he is placed first among the gods.

      • Marduk takes the 4 winds with him to face Tiamat, and she comes out to meet him with her mouth open to devour him.

      • He sends the winds into her mouth, blowing her up like a balloon, then he slices her in half.

      • Marduk makes a dome for the heavens out of the upper half of her body, and the earth out of the lower half.

      • Marduk also kills Tiamat's new lover Kingu, and makes man from his blood.
         

  • Genesis is not the only place in the OT where creation is mentioned, and some of the other references sound much like the "battle" imagery of enuma elish.

    • Psalms: 74, 89, 104

    • Remember that the P account was composed after the return from the Babylonian exile,

      • so this story is probably both influenced by the Babylonian creation myth

      • and written in response to it.

    • This may be why the author is careful not to use the Hebrew word for the sun on day 3, shamesh, which is almost identical to the Babylonian word Shamash, the name of their sun god.

    • This may also explain why creation of the sun is after vegetation- all things are dependent on God to live, not on the sun, which is itself dependent on God.
       

  • The Yahwist Creation

    • Earlier of the 2 accounts, differs from the P account in several ways:

      • reflects a different geographical setting.

        • P account reflects abundance of water typical of Mesopotamian settings (like Babylon)

        • Y account reflects dry, arid Palestinian setting

      • different order

        • In P account, man and woman are created last, in the "image of God," the pinnacle or conclusion of creation.

        • In J account, man is created first from the "clay of the ground." Animals are created later as companions for man; when they are not satisfactory woman is created.

      • different picture of God

        • In P account, God's transcendence is emphasized- he pre-exists the creation.

        • In J account, God's immediate, personal presence is emphasized. He:

          • Breathes life into man

          • plants a garden

          • walks in the garden

          • He is also both angry and compassionate:

            • He punishes Adam and Eve for disobedience, but makes clothes for them before expelling them from the garden.

      • different name for God:

        • "Elohim" in the P account

        • "Yahweh Elohim" in the J account
           

    • Key points:

      • "Adam" can mean "mankind," or "the first man" or it could be a personal name. Probably a pun on the Hebrew "Adamah" meaning "clay," "earth," or "ground."

      • "Eve" (chavvah) means "life."

        • The 2 are intended as archetypal humans, representing "everyman" and "everywoman."

      • "Eden" is probably a Hebrew import from the Babylonian word "edinu" which means "plain" or "desert."

        • v.10-15 claim the garden was located somewhere in relation to the Tigris and Euphrates. (possibly here)

        • translated as "paradeisos" in the septuagint, hence the English "paradise."

      • Man is given a responsibility when placed in the garden- to till it and care for it.

        • This carries over a theme from the P account:

          • In P, when man is created in "the image of God," he is told to "fill the earth and subdue it," and have dominion over all living things.

          • In J, Man is told to cultivate and care for the garden, just as God had done when he first created it.

        • Both stories make man unique above all other creatures, in that man is capable of acting like God.

      • Is woman made subordinate to man?

        • Not in P, both are created at the same time, and both in the image of God.

        • In J, woman is created last (man is first among living creatures) and as a "helper" to him.

          • Does this mean she is to serve him?

          • Probably not- the same Hebrew word here trans. as "helper" is used most often in the Bible in reference to God, esp. in the Psalms, where God is often referred to as helper to those in distress.

          • So while woman becomes subordinate to man as punishment, this is apparently not the way things were intended to be.
             

    • The Fall

      • Initiated by the serpent, who is described as "cunning" (but not evil).

        • Later Jewish and Christian commentators came to see the serpent as representative of "Satan," a fallen angel.

          • This concept appears NOWHERE in the OT,

          • but it does appear outside the Bible in a non-canonical writing called the "Life of Adam and Eve," written during the 1st century AD.
             

      • Serpent entices Eve to eat from the "Tree of the knowledge of good and bad."

        • Tells the woman that eating from the tree will make her "like gods who know what is good and what is bad."

          • The sin of Adam and Eve is the desire to be equal to God- failure to recognize their subordinate position to him

            • the downside of being created "in his image."

            • Does the serpent lie or deceive?
               

        • Note the consequences:

          • Man and woman become both aware and ashamed of their nakedness, and clothe themselves.

            • They "hide" from each other- symbolizing a state of suspicion between man and woman.

            • They hide from God when he walks through the garden.

            • When confronted with God's knowledge of their actions, the deny responsibility and pass blame (Eve to the serpent, Adam to Eve).
               

          • Through this, the story reveals the consequences of sin. Sin separates us from:

            • each other

            • God

            • ourselves/conscience
              (note how this plays out in the story of Cain and Abel)
               

        • Woman is punished with:

          • Pain in childbirth

          • submission to her husband

        • Man is punished with:

          • difficulty in bringing forth food from the soil
             

      • Problems with the story:

        • Why does God refuse to grant wisdom to humanity in the first place, esp. if we are created in his image?

        • Why is humanity expelled from the garden?

          • The text states that God is concerned that humans who have eaten from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil will "become like us" by eating from the tree of life.

          • Was man at first immortal?

            • If not, why is man punished by being told that he will "return to the dust"?

            • If so, weren't we "like God" to begin with? Why would God fear our immortality?
               

            • Ancient cultures considered superior knowledge and immortality to be the major difference between the gods and humans.
               

            • In J, Yahweh is concerned that if humans eat from both trees they will have both divine qualities, and be like the heavenly court.
               

            • So, the problem with humans for J is that we seek to be equal to God- to replace God with ourselves.

              • A theme that also shows up in the Tower of Babel story.

      • 2 things:

        • This story of the fall of man is never mentioned anywhere else in the Hebrew Bible.

        • Not until Daniel does the Hebrew Bible say anything about what happens to man after death.

          • Most of the OT assumes that everyone goes to the same place after death: Sheol.
             

    • Is man treated justly in the second creation story?

      • Man is given 2 responsibilities by God:

        • Be steward/caretaker of creation

        • Do not eat from the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

Cain & Abel

  • Should be read with the creation stories:

    • The creation digresses from "very good" to murder.

    • From family harmony to fratricide- brother kills brother.
       

  • Each brother represents a means of survival in ancient Palestine:

    • Abel is a "keeper of sheep" (herder)

    • Cain is a "tiller of the ground" (farmer)

      • The story reflects the tension between these two means, as both competed for the use of land.
         

  • Names are significant:

    • "Cain" from Hebrew "qanah" meaning "to create" or "to produce"

    • "Abel" from Hebrew "hevel" meaning "vapor" or "nothingness."

      • In the story, Cain, the older brother, would by tradition be the more important of the two, and entitled to the greates share of inheritance from his father.

      • But it is Abel's sacrifice (an animal) that is accepted over Cain's (vegetable).
         

    • Out of injured pride, Cain kills his brother.
       

    • As was typical of ancient cultures, the author assumes that when a person dies and is not properly buried (as in the case of a murder), his "blood cries out from the ground" to God for justice.
       

    • When confronted by Yahweh with his crime (as Adam and Eve were in the garden), Cain denies it and denies responsibility for his brother (Am I my brother's keeper?)

home | intro | contents | resources | appendices | assignments | glossary | sources | links

The Narrow Gate
2003-2004